Report highlights failure in primary health care

The Grattan Institute, a public policy ‘think tank’, has just published a report entitled ‘Chronic failure in primary care’ (see here). It is disappointing there is little reference to nurses in the report but that aside, it does give a good insight into the problems (and some possible solutions) in Australian primary health care.

Some highlights of the report are as follows:

  • Ineffective management of heart disease, asthma, diabetes and other chronic diseases costs the Australian health system more than $320 million a year in avoidable hospital admissions.
  • Only a quarter of the nearly one million Australians diagnosed with type 2 diabetes get the monitoring and treatment recommended for their condition.
  • Each year there are more than a quarter of a million admissions to hospital for health problems that potentially could have been prevented. Yet each year the government spends at least $1 billion on planning, coordinating and reviewing chronic disease management and encouraging good practice in primary care.
  • Three quarters of Australians over the age of 65 have at least one chronic condition that puts them at risk of serious complications and premature death. Social, economic and environmental changes are the best way to prevent these diseases, but there are much better outcomes where good quality primary care services are in place.
  • The focus must move away from GP fee-for-service payments for one-off visits; a broader payment for integrated treatment would help to focus care on patients and long-term outcomes.
  • PHNs should be given more responsibility for local primary care services. The evidence shows that a consistent, coordinated approach to specific diseases helps primary care more effectively prevent and manage chronic conditions. In regional areas, clear targets and well-designed incentives for disease prevention are vital.
  • There needs to be a focus on more flexible services, which might include greater use of nurses and allied health staff for assessment, planning, coordination, review and support of people with chronic disease.
  • Practice and incentive payments are not working.

Do you agree there are fundamental problems with our primary health care system? Are there any easy, or even achievable, solutions? We would love to know what you think.

The impact of asthma in Australia

A report recently issued by Deloitte Access Economics (commissioned by Asthma Australia and the National Asthma Council Australia) details the financial impact of asthma in Australia. The report (see here) is extremely comprehensive.

Some of the key points in the report are as follows:

  • There is estimated to be 2.4 million Australians with asthma in 2015
  • The prevalence of asthma in Australia is around 10%
  • Australia has the second highest prevalence of asthma among OECD countries – New Zealand has the highest at 14% and Korea the lowest at 1%
  • Australia’s high prevalence of asthma may be due to the variability of weather in Australia and the high prevalence of allergenic risk factors, including natural events such as thunderstorms and winds that distribute allergenic pollen, grasses and particles
  • The direct healthcare costs of asthma in Australia total $1.2 billion.

Some interesting food for thought for nurses.